Skip to main content

Guide

AML checks for estate agents in Ireland: what the 2010 Act actually requires

Facts verified against the consolidated Act, PSRA guidance and Citizens Information · · This is a practical summary, not legal advice.

Irish estate agents and auctioneers are “designated persons” under the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Act 2010 — which means anti-money-laundering duties are not a bank problem, they are your problem, supervised by the PSRA. Since the 2021 amendment (transposing the EU’s Fifth AML Directive), that covers all four licence categories: sales and auction agents and property managers without any threshold, and letting agents for tenancies where the monthly rent is at least €10,000.

The numbers that matter

Customer Due Diligence: what and when

CDD means:

  • identifying your customer and verifying identity against documents (a government-source document such as a passport or driving licence)
  • identifying any beneficial owner and understanding a company’s ownership and control structure
  • establishing the purpose of the business relationship (s.35 — s.33 covers identification and verification, not this)
  • monitoring it on an ongoing, risk-based footing

The duty runs across Chapter 3 of Part 4 of the Act — ss.33 to 40 as amended, read with the risk-based calibration in s.30B — not just the identification provisions in s.33.

The timing rule is the one that catches firms out.

  • CDD must happen before the business relationship is established — the PSRA’s Quick Guide puts it plainly: before signing the letter of engagement.
  • It is also owed to non-client customers in occasional transactions of €15,000 or more — the PSRA’s own example is a purchaser paying a booking deposit.
  • It is owed always, regardless of amounts, where laundering is suspected or identity documents are in doubt.

If a customer fails to produce the documents, the Act is blunt (s.33(8)): you must not provide the service while the failure continues, and must discontinue the relationship — and the failure itself can be grounds for a suspicious transaction report.

Politically exposed persons add a layer: before establishing the relationship you must determine whether the customer or beneficial owner is a PEP (or family member or close associate), and if so obtain senior-management approval, establish source of wealth and funds, and monitor on an enhanced basis (s.37).

Enhanced due diligence goes well beyond PEPs

Enhanced due diligence isn’t limited to politically exposed persons.

Section 39 (as substituted by s.19 of the 2018 Act), together with Schedule 4 to the Act, requires enhanced measures wherever a relationship or transaction presents a higher risk of money laundering — and Schedule 4’s own list of higher-risk factors reads like an ordinary week in estate agency:

  • a non-resident customer
  • a personal asset-holding vehicle
  • unusually complex or opaque ownership
  • a customer never met face to face
  • funds arriving from someone with no clear connection to the transaction

Section 38A adds a mandatory case on top: a customer established or resident in a country the European Commission has designated high-risk, which applies whenever an overseas purchaser buys through a company registered there.

Failing to apply enhanced measures where required is an offence in its own right (s.39(4), s.38A(4)): a class A fine (up to €5,000) and/or up to 12 months’ imprisonment on summary conviction, or an unlimited fine and/or up to 5 years on indictment.

Simplified due diligence is not “less file”

Section 34A allows reduced measures in a lower-risk situation — but only where that lower-risk area was already identified in your business risk assessment (s.34A(1)) and you judge the specific relationship lower risk.

Using it isn’t a shortcut: s.34A(3) requires a record of why you judged the relationship lower risk and the evidence behind that judgement, plus sufficient ongoing monitoring to catch anything that changes, and it stays expressly subject to the monitoring and record-keeping duties in s.33(1)(c) and (d). A firm that applies simplified due diligence without that paper trail has, on paper, done no due diligence at all.

Beneficial ownership: the register isn’t the whole job

Where a customer is a company, s.33(2)(b)(iii) lets you fall back on identifying its senior managing official only where you’ve taken reasonable measures to verify the beneficial owner’s identity and kept a record of the difficulties encountered — it is not a free pass.

The Central Register of Beneficial Ownership (S.I. No. 110/2019) helps but doesn’t discharge the duty on its own: Regulation 25(1) gives you a right of access to it, but Regulation 25(2) says it “shall not be relied upon exclusively” — you still need your own verification.

Two duties run the other way, too.

  • A company in a business relationship or occasional transaction with you must notify you of any relevant change to its beneficial ownership register within 14 days of becoming aware of it (Regulation 5(8)).
  • If you find a discrepancy between what you hold and what the register shows, Regulation 20(3) requires you to notify the Registrar in a timely manner — failing to do so is itself an offence under Regulation 28(6).

Two risk assessments, not one

The Act requires:

  • a documented, business-wide risk assessment (s.30A) — covering customer types, services, geography, transaction types and delivery channels, approved by senior management and kept up to date
  • a per-customer risk assessment (s.30B)

The PSRA expects every client rated high, medium or low with the rating clearly recorded, and publishes templates and checklists for both. Complex, unusually large or apparently purposeless transactions must be examined and monitored more closely (s.36A).

Suspicious transaction reports go to two places

Where you know, suspect or have reasonable grounds to suspect money laundering, s.42 requires a report to both FIU Ireland (via the goAML portal) and the Revenue Commissioners (via ROS), as soon as practicable.

Reporting to one does not discharge the duty to the other, and tipping off the subject afterwards is itself a criminal offence (s.49). PSRA inspectors expect licensees to demonstrate working knowledge of this at inspection.

Filing the report changes what you can do next. Section 42(7) says you must not proceed with the transaction until the report has been sent, subject to narrow carve-outs where that’s genuinely impracticable or would itself tip off the subject, and s.42(6) sets out what the report must contain; s.42(6A) also puts you on the hook to answer any follow-up questions from the FIU or Revenue.

Separately, a Garda superintendent can direct that a transaction be held for up to 7 days under s.17, and the District Court can extend that to up to 28 days by an order made ex parte and heard in camera, renewable — breaching a s.17 order carries up to 5 years on indictment.

There’s a prerequisite most firms discover too late: you cannot report “as soon as practicable” (s.42(2)) if your firm isn’t registered to report at all.

  1. Reporting to FIU Ireland needs your firm’s goAML Organisation registration checked and activated by the FIU before any user account can even be created.
  2. Reporting to Revenue needs the FIU Organisation ID from goAML first, plus a separate ROS sub-user digital certificate for each money laundering reporting officer — Revenue says this can take two or three days to appear in ROS.

Register both before you need to report, not after.

Records: five years, even after you cease trading

CDD documents and transaction histories must be kept for at least 5 years after the relationship ends or the transaction completes (s.55) — the PSRA notes this survives the firm ceasing to trade.

Deletion after that point isn’t a GDPR housekeeping choice: s.55(7B), inserted by the 2018 Amendment Act, requires you to delete personal data held solely for AML purposes once the retention period expires. Records you’re keeping for another reason at the same time — PSRA licensing, a Revenue obligation, defending a legal claim — sit outside that duty.

Staff must receive ongoing AML training, and your policies and procedures must be written down, approved by senior management and kept under review (s.54); the PSRA publishes a policies-and-procedures template it recommends every firm adopt.

These are criminal obligations, and the penalty structure is the same across every core duty above — the business risk assessment, Customer Due Diligence, suspicious transaction reporting, tipping off, policies and training, and records (ss.30A(8), 33(9), 42(9), 49(3), 54(15), 55(12) and 56(2)):

On summary conviction
a class A fine (up to €5,000) and/or up to 12 months’ imprisonment
On indictment
an unlimited fine and/or up to 5 years’ imprisonment

Money laundering itself carries up to 14 years.

What’s coming: the EU AML package

A new EU framework is on the way, on a longer runway than most guides mention.

Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 (the new AML Regulation) applies directly from 10 July 2027 (Art 90), and the accompanying Sixth Directive (EU) 2024/1640 is due to be transposed into Irish law by the same date — it’s that domestic transposing legislation, not the EU text itself, that will be the thing to watch as the date nears.

The new EU AML Authority, AMLA, established under Regulation (EU) 2024/1620, has been operating from its Frankfurt seat since 1 July 2025 — but it directly supervises only a shortlist of higher-risk financial entities; estate agents stay with the PSRA.

Five changes will matter here once transposed:

  1. both the buyer and the seller become “the customer” for full Customer Due Diligence, with no threshold (Art 19(6)(c))
  2. the occasional-transaction threshold drops to €10,000 (Art 19(1)(b))
  3. a real-estate-specific timing rule requires verification “after an offer is accepted by the seller or lessor, and in all cases before any funds or property are transferred” — a different trigger from the PSRA’s current letter-of-engagement rule (Art 23(1), second subparagraph)
  4. an EU-wide €10,000 cash payment cap (Art 80(1))
  5. a 14-calendar-day deadline to report a beneficial-ownership discrepancy (Art 24(1))

What this means for your systems

Every duty above reduces to the same operational question: when the PSRA inspector, the auditor or a solicitor asks, can you produce the file?

EstatePilot builds the CDD file as the sale progresses: proof of identity, proof of address, proof of funds, beneficial ownership declarations and company registration held against the client record, each reviewed by a named person at your agency with their notes attached and a SHA-256 checksum taken automatically, and a five-year retention date set the moment the file closes — matching the s.55 duty above.

For online auctions, no paddle number is issued until the registration is approved. See PSRA and AML compliance software or the companion guide to PSRA obligations.

Common questions

Yes — under section 25(1)(f) of the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Act 2010. Since the 2021 amendment this covers all four PSRA licence categories: sale, auction and property-management agents have no threshold at all. Letting agents pick up the €10,000-a-month rent threshold only for when Customer Due Diligence must be run on a given tenancy — the firm-level duties (a business risk assessment, written policies, five-year records) apply regardless of rent, and CDD is owed at any amount the moment money laundering is suspected.

Sources: the consolidated Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Act 2010, the PSRA’s AML pages and its published Quick Guide and sector guidance, and Citizens Information. Verified . This guide is a practical summary for working agents, not legal advice — confirm current requirements with the PSRA or your solicitor.

See the AML file on a live sale

See a Customer Due Diligence file assembled as part of a normal sale — before anyone asks for it.